Volume 20, Issue 4 (JIAEEE Vol.20 No.4 2023)
Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2023, 20(4): 147-162 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abiari H, Daemi T, Saeid S A. Unit Commitment Considering the malfunctioned Operation of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems in Frequency Stability Support. Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2023; 20 (4) :147-162
URL: http://jiaeee.com/article-1-1477-en.html
URL: http://jiaeee.com/article-1-1477-en.html
Department of Electrical Engineering, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (783 Views)
Using security-constrained unit commitment as a preventative method of supplying power system frequency response can increase the penetration of renewable energy sources while maintaining frequency response parameters within their allowable range. Moreover, it can reduce the need for corrective actions such as under-frequency load shedding and can prevent power blackouts. So far, there have been two views about the virtual inertia of grid-connected energy storage units, pessimistic (lack of virtual inertia) and optimistic (failure-free frequency response). However, in reality, the frequency response supply system may experience malfunction and incorrect operation, which is modeled and analyzed in this paper from a techno-economic standpoint. False sensor detection, control system malfunction, wrong power injection of energy storage, inverter failure, improper parameter setting, etc., can all be considered disruptive factors. However, in order to have a more general model, the article avoids dealing with the reason behind the poor performance of the storage system and focuses only on its effects, i.e., the possibility of the storage system not participating correctly. The proposed model takes into account the system's frequency stability by linearly integrating the nadir frequency and the rate of change of frequency limits to the robust mixed-integer linear programming model with YALMIP and MOSEK solvers. The results of implementing this model in the IEEE-RTS96 network show that neglecting energy storage system malfunctions can lead to violations of frequency constraints that must be compensated by increasing costs and keeping more online units with more free headroom.
Keywords: Unit Commitment, Frequency Stability, Hybrid Energy Storage Systems, Renewable Energy Resources
Type of Article: Research |
Subject:
Power
Received: 2022/06/9 | Accepted: 2023/01/21 | Published: 2023/08/6
Received: 2022/06/9 | Accepted: 2023/01/21 | Published: 2023/08/6
Extended Abstract [PDF 263 KB] (15 Download)
References
1. [1] R. Ghaffarpour, Y. Hashemi, and H. Alami, "Security-constrained Unit Commitment and Proposing the Probabilistic Model of Plants Inaccessibility in Emergency," (in eng), Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Research vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 11-27, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://jiaeee.com/article-1-446-en.html.
2. [2] Z. Wu et al., "State-of-the-art review on frequency response of wind power plants in power systems," Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2018. [DOI:10.1007/s40565-017-0315-y]
3. [3] A. Safari and H. Shahsavari, "Frequency-constrained unit commitment problem with considering dynamic ramp rate limits in the presence of wind power generation," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5241-5254, 2019. [DOI:10.1007/s00521-018-3363-y]
4. [4] D. L. H. Aik, "A general-order system frequency response model incorporating load shedding: analytic modeling and applications," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 709-717, 2006. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873123]
5. [5] K. Shi, H. Ye, W. Song, and G. Zhou, "Virtual inertia control strategy in microgrid based on virtual synchronous generator technology," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 27949-27957, 2018. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2839737]
6. [6] T. Kerdphol, F. S. Rahman, M. Watanabe, Y. Mitani, D. Turschner, and H.-P. Beck, "Enhanced virtual inertia control based on derivative technique to emulate simultaneous inertia and damping properties for microgrid frequency regulation," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 14422-14433, 2019. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892747]
7. [7] T. Xu, W. Jang, and T. Overbye, "Commitment of fast-responding storage devices to mimic inertia for the enhancement of primary frequency response," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1219-1230, 2017. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2735990]
8. [8] M. Tuo and X. Li, "Security-constrained unit commitment considering locational frequency stability in low-inertia power grids," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2022. [DOI:10.1109/NAPS56150.2022.10012162]
9. [9] S. S. Oskouee, S. Kamali, and T. Amraee, "Primary frequency support in unit commitment using a multi-area frequency model with flywheel energy storage," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 5105-5119, 2021. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3074634]
10. [10] D. Rebollal, M. Chinchilla, D. Santos-Martín, and J. M. Guerrero, "Endogenous approach of a frequency-constrained unit commitment in islanded microgrid systems," Energies, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 6290, 2021. [DOI:10.3390/en14196290]
11. [11] D. T. Lagos and N. D. Hatziargyriou, "Data-driven frequency dynamic unit commitment for island systems with high RES penetration," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4699-4711, 2021. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3060891]
12. [12] Y. Zhang et al., "Encoding frequency constraints in preventive unit commitment using deep learning with region-of-interest active sampling," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1942-1955, 2021. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3110881]
13. [13] C. Ferrandon-Cervantes, B. Kazemtabrizi, and M. C. Troffaes, "Inclusion of frequency stability constraints in unit commitment using separable programming," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 203, p. 107669, 2022. [DOI:10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107669]
14. [14] Y. Yuan, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, Z. Liu, and Z. Chen, "Enhanced Frequency-Constrained Unit Commitment Considering Variable-Droop Frequency Control from Converter-based Generator," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2022. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3170935]
15. [15] T. Ding, Z. Zeng, M. Qu, J. P. Catalão, and M. Shahidehpour, "Two-stage chance-constrained stochastic thermal unit commitment for optimal provision of virtual inertia in wind-storage systems," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3520-3530, 2021. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3051523]
16. [16] T.-A. Nguyen-Huu, V. T. Nguyen, K. Hur, and J. W. Shim, "Coordinated control of a hybrid energy storage system for improving the capability of frequency regulation and state-of-charge management," Energies, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 6304, 2020. [DOI:10.3390/en13236304]
17. [17] X. Zhou, "Hybrid energy storage systems for power system frequency control," Master of Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2018.
18. [18] U. Akram, R. Shah, and N. Mithulananthan, "Hybrid energy storage system for frequency regulation in microgrids with source and load uncertainties," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 5048-5057, 2019. [DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.7064]
19. [19] J. Li et al., "A novel use of the hybrid energy storage system for primary frequency control in a microgrid," Energy Procedia, vol. 103, pp. 82-87, 2016. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.253]
20. [20] Q. Yan, Q. Bo, Y. Jingjie, M. Yunfei, and G. Bingqing, "Frequency control strategy of hybrid energy storage system for microgrid based on frequency hysteretic loop," Energy Procedia, vol. 103, pp. 328-332, 2016. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.294]
21. [21] J. Lofberg, "YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB," in 2004 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37508), 2004: IEEE, pp. 284-289.
22. [22] M. ApS, "Mosek optimization toolbox for MatLab," User's Guide and Reference Manual, Version, vol. 4, 2019.
23. [23] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and R. J. Thomas, "MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education," IEEE Transactions on power systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2010. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168]
24. [24] N. Blair et al., "System advisor model, sam 2014.1. 14: General description," National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2014.
25. [25] Z. Zhang, E. Du, F. Teng, N. Zhang, and C. Kang, "Modeling frequency dynamics in unit commitment with a high share of renewable energy," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 4383-4395, 2020. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2996821]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This Journal is an open access Journal Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (CC BY NC 4.0) |
